Developed by Kene (StableLab) and Alex (Proxy)
Learning objectives
Video
Slides
Strategic Governance for Growth
Section 4: Leveraging Scroll to Co-create value
Section 5: Key Lessons for Strategic Governance case studies
Section 6: Revenue-Sharing and Partnership Deals
Conclusion
Implications and Significance
Theoretical Implications
This research contributes to our understanding of decentralized coordination by demonstrating that:
- Governance as a Coordination Mechanism: Strategic governance transcends simple voting to become a sophisticated coordination tool. The emergence of meta-governance, bribe markets, and cross-protocol working groups shows that DAOs can solve complex coordination problems previously thought to require centralized authority.
- Value Creation Through Collaboration: The positive-sum outcomes achieved through partnerships like Maker-Aave's D3M and the Sky Aave Force challenge zero-sum competitive thinking. These successes provide empirical evidence that collaborative strategies can outperform competitive approaches in creating sustainable value.
- Emergent Institutional Structures: The evolution of partnership frameworks, standardized processes, and professional governance facilitation represents the emergence of new institutional forms native to decentralized systems. These structures maintain the benefits of decentralization while achieving coordination efficiency previously associated only with traditional organizations.
Practical Implications
For practitioners and protocol contributors, these findings suggest:
- Partnership as Core Strategy: Strategic partnerships should be considered essential growth mechanisms rather than optional activities. Protocols that excel at partnership development will likely outperform those operating in isolation, creating compounding advantages over time.